– #Shorthand Note[1] on biblico-philosophical pollution being virally spread, recycled and spread again among biblico-philosophical wastemakers and their ruminants –
Although bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers, its reception (critical or ingenuous) has not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation. Here we focus on pseudo-profound bullshit, which consists of seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually vacuous. (On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit)
Cal's instant audio-sensory cure, hit button for immediate relief of idiocy & numbness, free of charge … as often as you like …
Frame of Reference
[1] On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-profound Bullshit (Wikisource) ––– On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit (scottbarrykaufman.com) ––– On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. | Judgment & Decision Making | EBSCOhost ––– The PBSDS: A Dataset for the Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit (ceur-ws.org) ––– The Ig Nobel Prizes for Improbable Research 2016 | Primary Care Nursing Review (pcnr.co.uk) ––– Editable Newspapers Template (sjdm.org)
Share this post